I've decided that while i'm happy with this blog it is too distintively like me and i chose a bad handle (this being my first blog).
I'm changing the setup into two blogs to reduce this problem. I have wanted to move off tblog (so i can have more control of things...i must admit the crashes have stopped, but i still don't have January's archive here which is an annoyance...it is at home). Its kinda an all over thing.
I would be happy to pass on the new handles to folks who send me a tmail. I know a lot of you don't want to be identified and i'll loose you as readers and i'm sorry about that and unhappy (the only reason i stayed here in late Dec early Jan was because of how wonderful people here are).
But its time to move on. This was an experiment and i think it worked well. But its time for me to move on.
I love you guys and i'll miss those of you who don't tmail...including those of you who i don't know but who i feel have shared an important part of my life.
Please think of tmailing...i'll erase it all if that helps (as long as you erase the new blogname eh? its based on trust i guess....) Marcie
Well today seems to be a news day (one of the first days i've caught up with some of the news...i should be getting more in the next few days because of political reasons...the Federal budget is being read today and because there is a minority government there are ammendments by the Conservative Party and the Bloc Quebecois read into it over the next two days.) I put in three stories that seemed praticularly importand and either likely to be differently (to some extent) published outside Canada or not published at all.
But i'm going to leave that to another entry. I've changed the colour of the boxes...i decided that i think the pink it too jaring (i like it but it was even starting to get on my nerves at times when against the yellow background. I must say that either colour pickers have improved or i have a better idea of how they work (or both). I downloaded two programs (both freeware) and one of them was able to do what i wanted (i can mostly pick the colour with different things...not that i want real complicated and then it will give me the html code...it will also give me the RGB but that doesn't do me much good as i understand the idea but not how to use it on a page). I like this ciolour...but who knows exactly how it will wear on me over time. I'm making some corrections and i think its a little to close to black...i guess i'll try a slightly different combination next time (close to black won't kill it in the meantime...but there may be colour changes back and forth on the boxes until i find what i want....
So onto the news. I'm again aware that you likely need cookies to read this news...or you can go to cbc.ca to find the stories. They don't send junk mail (i run alternate mail addresses to find out who does). Or you can read what i've got and leave it at that...or you can register but ask not to be sent anything (which will get you the cookie you need). CBC is a crown corporation which means that it is partly funded by the federal government and its even more arm lengths than most crown corporations (for obvious reasons). They didn't require you to sign up for a long time...and since they will still allow you in free my guess is its just a way that they can show their numbers...most of the newspapers in Canada that send out email notes on stories already require the same ie. the Toronto Star requires it...and its addresses are different depending on which type you access...every time i do their stories i have to look them up based on title in another browser to get the general code...with CBC i don't need to do that...but you need the cookie...whose better...i'm not sure...CBC is sure easier for me to do as a result. I'm pretty sure if you press on the CBC news link for the stories i put in the easier editor that will get you to cbc.ca as well.
So the news:
(the first is the whole story give its importance)
Last Updated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:55:35 EST CBC News
OTTAWA - The Liberal government is expected to present a balanced budget Wednesday that includes billions of new dollars for the military and the Kyoto Accord while offering tax breaks to some Canadians.
Finance Minister Ralph Goodale will present an eighth consecutive Liberal budget that balances the nation's books – and is designed to placate the opposition parties who have the power to defeat the minority government.
Goodale is expected to announce around $13 billion for Canada's cash-strapped military. About one-third of the funding, which will be spread over five years, will be directed towards capital projects and infrastructure for the military, The Canadian Press reported.
The environment will also be a key focus of the budget, with about $5 billion earmarked for compliance with the Kyoto Accord, half of it new money. About $1 billion of that will go to a new fund for incentives to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
Goodale will use the budget to showcase how his government plans to save money by becoming more environmentally friendly.
The plan will include a new Office of Green Procurement at the Department of Public Works that will look for energy-efficient ways to trim 10 per cent of the department's contracting costs.
Money for social programs will include $5 billion over five years for a new child care program, with a $1 billion initial commitment to be made Wednesday.
To appease the Conservatives, tax cuts will come through a boost to the basic personal exemption amount.
The Canadian Press reports the plan will include an increase totalling almost $2,000 over the next four years in the basic personal amount that one can earn before income tax kicks in.
That will ultimately bump about 800,000 low-income earners off the federal tax rolls.
Immigration will also get a boost of $400 million over five years including funding to help foreign doctors get their credentials recognized in Canada.
The budget is also expected to include more money for foreign aid and an increase to seniors benefits.
Last Updated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:45:33 EST CBC News
OTTAWA - Prime Minister Paul Martin will reject Canadian participation in the U.S. missile defence program.
Martin plans to announce in the House of Commons as early as Thursday that the country will not partake fully in the controversial program.
The news comes hours after Canada's next ambassador to the United States, Frank McKenna, set off a storm by saying Canada is already taking part in the program because it has agreed Norad can monitor the skies for incoming missiles.
Martin's planned announcement will mark an abrupt change from his position 16 months ago during the Liberal leadership race, when he signaled that Canada should partake in missile defence. Since then, Martin has insisted that he hasn't reached a decision on whether Canada should be a full partner.
...(after pressure from GWB) But federal officials, who wished to remain anonymous, told the CBC's Radio-Canada that domestic considerations may have outweighed pressure from Washington.
....Federal officials told the Canadian Press later on Tuesday that the United States was informed of Canada's decision at the NATO summit in Brussels.
"[The Americans] were told we will not participate," a federal official, who asked to remain anonymous, told the agency.
"It is a firm 'no.' I am not sure it is an indefinite 'no.''"
....Earlier Tuesday, McKenna, a former New Brunswick premier, delivered an opposite message outside a meeting of the foreign affairs committee, which is examining his appointment as the next ambassador to the United States.
...."I believe that we've given in large measure what the Americans want, which is the ability to use Norad and their intercept information in order to be able to target weaponry," he said.
Canada agreed last August to allow Norad, the joint Canada-U.S. air defence command, to share information it gathers with the people running the U.S. missile defence program.
...Conservative Leader Stephen Harper wasn't buying the distinction.
...."How could this prime minister secretly make this decision, so clearly breaking every commitment he's made to this house and to Canadians?" he asked during Question Period.
....U.S. has 'great deal' of what it needs: McKenna
McKenna told reporters he believes the U.S. now has much of what it needs to operate a "modest ballistic missile defence program."
A comment on this one. Its not new news that the US has information about our airspace....and that we have refused bombs. But its very old news so i suppose it might be easy to miss. It was when John Diefenbaker (Progressive Conservative Goverment) was Prime Minister that Canada refused to take Nukes from the US as part of Norad (read late 50's very early 60's). And obviously it meant a great deal to the US because the US was pissed off as hell. They weren't definetly not pleased when the next Prime Minister Lester B Pearson (Liberal Party of Canada) also refused...that meant it was a done deal at least for quite a while.
Now whether we should be part of the moniotring system...wether we will allow a bomb to be shot on our space is a more controversial issue. The cruise missles were actually tested over Canada (fact you may not have known) and it pissed off a hell of a lot of Canadians and it was protested and took quite a few years to happen. But it seems to me that McKenna is in the wrong on saying that montioring air space is the same thing...although if he's seen something else i guess that is different.
Last Updated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:08:03 EST CBC News
HO CHI MINH CITY, VIETNAM - The world is teetering on the edge of a deadly pandemic spurred by avian flu and governments must make emergency plans immediately, a top official from the World Health Organization says.
"We at WHO believe that the world is now in the gravest possible danger of a pandemic," Dr. Shigeru Omi, who heads the UN health agency's Western Pacific office, warned a conference on Wednesday.
"If the virus becomes highly contagious among humans, the health impact in terms of deaths and sickness will be enormous and certainly much greater than SARS."
The scientific conference in Ho Chi Minh City is aimed at co-ordinating attempts to eradicate the H5N1 avian flu virus, which has decimated the region's poultry industry and killed 45 people in Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia.
Experts have reportedly warned that the virus could mutate into a form that can spread between people and be as deadly as the viruses that killed millions during the world's three influenza pandemics last century.
"This is why we are urging all governments to work now on a pandemic preparedness plan – so that even in an emergency such as this, they will be able to provide basic public services such as transport, sanitation and power," Omi said.
Animal health officials said there's still time to prevent a pandemic by stopping it at its source.
But Dr. Samuel Jutzi of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization warned that many countries affected by the virus don't have the tools and surveillance systems they need to curb the spread.
This one is also the whole story (minus picture) given the importance...there are a few things i think of when i read this article....
The first is that we are in big trouble with this flu. At first it had trouble jumping to humans. It is now jumping to humans. And it basically needs two things to become a pandemic: either to infect a pig and that has some other virus (pig viruses generally spread quite nicely in humans) or because it is mutating so nicely on its own...to just mutate somewhat differntly. What needs to be kept in mind is that most mutations may not mean much...but the one's that work can spread quite well thank you once you have them.
The second thing that comes to mind was a scare in the last few years (during SARS i think i'm not sure). It had to do with Canada's drug laws (heavily changed to be good to the US when the Conservatives were in government and then the Liberals. In the end Canada gave a generic company in Canada the right to produce a drug for viruses because they couldn't get enough of it...and if it was during SARS we are talking of something that was relatively well contained (comapred to flu...it was still mean and not nice). Which brings me to thinking of your nice flu vaccinations this year...we are already stockpiling two types of drugs for flu in Canada .Two types means they are worried...one is very good against most viruses...the others is so so but would help. and from what i hear refusing at this point to send it to the US wich means they concerned masse because we may need it. You might want to ask what your country is doing about that. Because while i hear them trying to buy our supply i don't hear about them stockpiling. If our government got smart i think they would just break the patent law again now while there is time to produce lots and lots of what may be needed. But of course that would be a political bomb. I'm pretty sure they will if thee is a problem though...and i wouldn't be surprised if the generic companies are already working on doing it.
The final part of the article haunts me...the part that says: But Dr. Samuel Jutzi of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization warned that many countries affected by the virus don't have the tools and surveillance systems they need to curb the spread.. It doesn't haunt me because the countries infected aren't doing more...they have worked hard. We had a flu problem in (mostly British Columbia) last year. It wasn't as serious as it didn't effect humans all that much (pink eye was sometimes contracted and stuff like that). But it was hell for use to try and get rid of it and millions of birds were culled (there were even arguements over where the carcasses would go). And it stayed mainly contained to one part of province and chickens. Once they figured out one of the ways it was spreading was on the boots of people moving from farm to farm it helped a lot...but that took quite a while...well over a month i think. On the current virus i've seen reports from parts of WHO that they now consider the virus pandemic in those areas. And they are in the wild bird population which makes it a hell of a lot harder. But wouldn't it all save us (hopefully not but in all probability) a lot of money and lives if we spent the money now trying to help those countries curb the spread. It would be great if we did it charitably...but even a self centred country should be able to see it would be to their advantage to help in the area now. Some are....but there needs to be a consercerted effort...and from what i know Canada isn't doing all that much either and certainly not enough.
Well that is all the news for the moment.M
On bugs and low income housing (bed bugs and roaches)
I don't have the most enlightening stuff or as much for the last few days i imagine (although i'm still trying...and getting some interesting stuff). Funny how the page seems to go personal...political/news coverage....personal. Ideally in a perfect world i'd set it at half and half...but i'm usually in one mindset or another at any one point in time....and i don't want my blog to be a huge chore. I want my entries to look nice (and over time they are improving i think...look at Oct. to see a difference). And i want them to be interesting and something that i would like to share with other people.
But when i'm not reading the news (or i'm skimmming it) i don't come up with all that many news stories...although if something interests me (even originally starting in skimming mode) you may get an awful lot of it: Witness Wal-Mart and unions (go back a few days if it isn't still showing when you read this).
And heck if i spend three or four hours researching bed bugs, cut and pasting and formatting it because my building has bed bugs (which aren't well known anymore....they got rid of most of them with DDT which isn't an option anymore)...well its somewhere i can share the 3 hours work with that it might be better appreciated (i gave copies to the landlord and the exterminator....more on a i'm not an expert but this is from university sites [one exception it was some type of Alaska lower level gov how to deal with bed bugs...frankly i don't know enough about Alaska to really tell...and i believed i mentioned on here i took out the most controversial part because it didn't turn up anywhere else (that is i told you what it was here...i blacked it out when i copied it).
I've written of the bugs before. I'll likely write of them later...i'm trying to put a slightly different view...as my view can change over time and well things are not always black and white. There is the law. There are cheap landlords. Rights that vary from spot to spot and people that are hoping they will save money by what they are avoiding doing now......and maybe they will or it may cost them money...but they are betting it will be cheaper because few will even fight them. I lost a lot of stuff during a renovating earlier this year when among other things they flodded my apt. (why i'm more sensitive on the issue---at this poing i'm not going further because it just pushed up my blood pressure). But if i loose much from the bed bugs....i'll go to court (several ways to do that where i live). Mind you being in non profit housing helps... although not as much as you might think (i guess what you think depends on where you are coming from.... non profit housing in Canada at least has an image of often being in good shape and well cared for [and some of it is some of it isn't]. Slightly differerent from the view you get when you read average US media (about US public/not for profit housing)...but then i've read of some really good housing in the US....in Ms. though...doesn't seem to make the mainstream
If you are interested i'm glad to have someone who will like reading. If not...well its part of living on a low income and it would be nice if you read some...but its a blog folks...you get to read the parts you like...if all you like are politics and media...well i do enough of that continue to visit please......... And bugs are a problem for many middle income (hidden carefully). If you are low income it would be surprising if you haven't run into them at some point. Bed bugs are a pain and have no relation to food or cleanliness in apt. (bed bugs don't eat anything other than blood.....you could have food all over and they'd die. They need YOU or perhaps a pet!)
In fact having been in lower income housing....since i got my own place means that i've been sprayed for bugs a number of times...the first time when i was 18. Then the neighbours below were terrible at such and moved out. The new neighbours told the landlord they had roaches and she said they didn't....and during one such discussion a really nice one walked across the carpet. Most of the problem was in the basement (we were on second floor) but if here is a fact you may or may not know.....roaches physically CAN NOT climb down. So if they decide to go anywhere vertically (as oposed to left or right) they go up. And they like going up the heating and such as its harder to get the spray in there. So if you are above it you get sprayed unless you want them as pets (although the woman above that decided not to and was ok).
That landlord gave us the chemicals and told us to spray the apt. I think the other tenants might have...we sprayed the kitchen (found one roach...and they come out when you spray....gross...but more or less expected if the place downstairs has been infested for months). Then we talked about it (the kitchen was the smallest room and we were feeling sick) called the landlord and told her we would prepare the room but we could not spray it and she would have to get proffessionals (those of you in this type of trouble...check the law in your area as well as how much a landlord can harrass you. In my place at that time it was just considered common place that the landlord pay for a proffessional as they can keep the stuff better out of their system we didn't even get masks i think...although i could be wrong). After her letting it go for a while as the first floor tenants tried to proove there were bugs...it obviously wasn't our fault...they could do it and pay. This can vary a lot based on where you are....but at least up here making you do it yourself on that type of basis is considered a bad move.
Now being in low income housing i have troubles getting things fixed (as i've lammented on). And they aren't doing enough preventative work for the bugs...and there are other problems [ie a 150 square foot apartment and you are told to put everything in the middle and leave 3 feet around the walls....i dare you to make it fit!Some people can....a lot of us can't. Seeing as already using the vertical to spread things out its pretty much impossible. I did get a preventative spraying done and was able to make a lot of the baseboards available by moving the bed because i use bricks to build and you can get by them...although they weren't happy. Place is much more organized now...but nothing is going to fix the lack of space! If it comes up again i'm going through my CMHA worker ( a CMHA worker was there at my request and pushed on the space issue...cmha=canadian mental health care worker... my actual one was busy but they organized someone to come when i asked... i mean i was arrested (if not pulled out of the building) in Nov. over the issue. I wanted to go but i wanted someone to make sure they stayed reasonable.
Then the exterminator says we aren't getting it organized enough (at the meeting) at times. We pointed out the space....they pointed to the landlord who said we could use empty apts...but when pressed admitted that if no apts were empty we were SOL...its not always not being not organized enough!)]. This is subsized low income housing...they fill a spot as soon as they can from a huge waitlist...so what about our stuff? In fact there are storage rooms on each floor that could work except the handyman declared them his years ago (even though he has one officially on the top floor) and we aren't able to put anything in them. And it isn't just take it out put it in although that is pretty impossible (i had an incident on that i'm not getting into today). You need to stay out for at least 8 hours...which means you aren't moving things in for 8 hours. And i'm not leaving them in the hall!
So we have more info at least. About 10% of the apts. have a problem. The exterminator is not following all methods available (the time consuming/expensive) because the landlord doesn't appear to want to pay for them (for example the caulking is important from everything i read but time consumming...two of us read about it seperately...at first they didn't "know" what we were talking about EXCEPT for caulking with pesticide....and even then they weren't paying for it!). And that they find us frustrated without organized apts. and we find it frustrating in small apts to get them organized.
I've been bombed quite a few times over the years. One building i moved into (new) had to be bombed continually (whole thing) a few times until they found the roaches were comming in through the drains and plumming. Even then it had to be done now and then although not always the whole building.
So they say only 10% is not big. problem...envioronmentally unsafe to spray...although (can i say it again) caulking and other things can be done that they aren't doing because they aren't paid. And we are having to find it ourselves...i've already swapped info and been to a board meeting.
I did however manage to proove something that they eventually admitted was correct (and was important to me). If your bed is a good bed (mine is) it can be successfully sprayed and then put in a bad for dust mites and if you don't have pets and leave it that way for over a year (two would be good) it should be fine (to get real details go elsewhere or tmail me....). Before they were just saying they needed to be thrown out. And if its not all that good a bed welfare or disability will replace it. But their beds are shit. I was on their orthopedic for 6 months (ie their "best" bed). It had springs....the main difference from the welfare bed i had when i was 18 (i've avoided them since then). And my back hurt the whole time... my bed was donated and i waited about 2 years. It was chance i got a good for you back one from what i know and i believe it...otherwise some type of bed would have appeared sooner. Its a donation program from a chain of the bed companies. If you buy a bed from them they will take your old one out (often the garbage will not pick it up). And if you agree and it is in good shape they will donate it to a person that needs a bed (like i did). Also beds that are tried out but returned sometimes go into that mix (not mine....not the right brand from what i know).
But mine turned up in great shaped and looked like new. And my whole apt. is much better now (in an apt. my size the bed matters. At one point the landlord was telling one person if she'd gotten insurance she would be covered for all she lost (she lost everything but her TV). Since then i've been telling the staff on and off when the topic of the bugs come up that the landlord doesn't know what they are talking about....bugs aren' covered and with how long they've been going on with the problem they would likely be found negligent (there would be a good case possibly otherwise...more than 6 months later and the landlord has not taken all steps...better case.
One good thing they are doing is spraying each apt. as someone moves and someone new moves in. I imagine its helped to slow the spread....
That's all for now folks. M
PS: Knock wood but ifi had to have bugs i'd much prefer roaches than bed bugs. Roaches don't bite and they generally know how to get rid of them (they are only relearning with bed bugs). I"m allergic to bug bites so they bother me more than average...but even if i wasn't i've never seen so much furniture thrown out over roaches...oh and did i mention roaches don't bite
Bush seems unable to understand Canadian politics--- article and comment
Appology for wierd spacing...can't seem to fix it...just scroll down a bit more between title of artcle and picture. M
Ok this article shows sseveral things....the first and largest one being that Bush has no idean how Canadian politics actually works. What i heard (and i'm pretty sure was in then ews) was that Bush wasnot supposed to discuss Missle Defense with our PM (or others...although that is less clear) at all.
Just because its a Conservative Party does not mean that we will get into the Ballistic program (it might increase the odds but it might not----Diefenbaker was the Canadian Conservative PM who refused to take nukes on Canada's soil like the US wanted to in the early 60's).
Second the guy has obviously painfully no i dea how a minority government works. Basically you are extreemly careful about what you do and picking your fights....because quite litterally there could be an election any time. There doesn't have to be one.....but if the government (Liberal Party) can't pass legislation there will be one ( a piece here and there isn't a big deal, unless its a confidence type bill---like budgets, which is later this wekk).
So nobody is going to take an unpopular positiong. It appears Martin was almost about the sign up for the program....when he realized he'd have to call and election and changed his mind.....so why would Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party do different?
Also i'm amazed at how rude the guy is....he was supposed to leave the topic alone at least with Martin...a bald lie it seems. Makes me glad i had come to Ottawa and was out protesting the day he came (see aprx Nov 30 entries on topic).
There is a good chance there shold be more articles and maybe an editoral soon...i'm going to keep my eyes open (CP is similar to AP)
Oh and here is the news article that started me on this discussion.
Bush scolded Harper on missile plan
CP FILE
Conservative Leader Stephen Harper and U.S. President George W. Bush were all smiles when they met in Ottawa late last year.
Tory leader's support sought Comments made on Ottawa visit
The U.S. president used his trip to Canada in December to bluntly voice irritation with Harper's enigmatic position on missile defence, sources on both sides of the border say.
One U.S. official described Bush's reproach to Harper as: "Please don't play partisan politics with this."
"I would hope you're looking at this in Canada's national interest and not in terms of partisan politics," Bush reportedly told Harper.
Recent polls have shown a majority of Canadians oppose Canada's participation in missile defence.
That opposition has mounted in the vacuum of any vocal support for the program from anyone in the Liberal government apart from Defence Minister Bill Graham and Public Safety Minister Anne McLellan.
Prime Minister Paul Martin supported Canadian involvement in the initiative when he was a leadership candidate, but has avoided moving forward without Conservative support.
Bush unexpectedly asked Martin pointed questions about Canada's refusal to sign during their meeting, but it's now clear the Prime Minister wasn't the only Canadian political leader to get the Bush treatment.
Harper didn't deny being pressured by Bush last Nov. 30 during their half-hour meeting. But he said it appeared someone had misled the president about Conservative policy.
"It was clear to me at the outset of our conversation that the president had been misinformed about our position," Harper said in an interview.
That position, Harper replied, is not hostile to missile defence. But it will force the Liberals to properly explain the plan before bringing it to Parliament.
"We're not going to agree to a proposal we don't have the details for," Harper said.
"While we're all very open in the Conservative party to this kind of initiative, we don't really trust the Liberals to just negotiate with a blank cheque."
Another Conservative offered a blunter explanation for why a military-friendly and staunchly pro-U.S. Official Opposition is suddenly mute on missile defence: It makes Liberals sweat.
"Let's see them govern and make a decision for once, instead of relying on us."
Now two party leaders who previously supported missile defence — Harper and Martin — are entangled in a cautious dance with nobody's feet moving and everyone's eyes glued to public opinion.
The Liberals are frozen at the thought of being forced to fight a future election campaign as the only federal party officially in support of the missile project.
Polls suggest the program is supported by only about one-third of Canadians, and is especially unpopular with key electoral constituencies: Quebecers, urban and female voters are especially hostile to the plan.
The controversial project has also divided the governing party and is expected to overshadow the Liberal policy convention next month in Ottawa. The party's youth and Quebec wings plan to table motions against the missile defence scheme.
"We know we're going to get destroyed (on missile defence) at the convention," said one senior Liberal.
That kind of hostility had Liberal brass hoping they could use the Tories to carry a symbolic vote on missile defence in the House of Commons.
With the support of his foes, the Prime Minister could then sign on to missile defence shielded against attacks from rivals, especially from Harper.
Martin has been frustrated by Harper's refusal to play along — so frustrated that during his own meeting with Bush, the Prime Minister tried blaming his opponent for the missile defence standstill, according to one account.
One of Bush's interlocutors said Martin told the U.S. president he had shown Harper a "proposal" for missile defence that the Conservative leader refused to support.
Conservatives say they were told of Martin's complaint to Bush. They say Harper has seen no formal proposal and are accusing the Prime Minister of misleading the president.
But the decision to raise missile defence with Harper was made weeks in advance and had nothing to do with anything Martin said, according to U.S. officials.
"The president might not be following Canada that closely — but there are people (in Ottawa) and in Washington paid to do that," said one U.S. official.
"The president was getting his information from U.S. sources. ... (And) there was concern."
Polls consistently show we want social reinvestments (in Canada)
Hi...for those of you who are new Linda McQuaig is one of my favourite Canadian nationalist left authors (ie writes for normal humans not university students). Maude Barlow is the second in that categoryShe writes every second week in The Star and i keep on saying i want to link to the articles and forget...so i thought i'd put today's article up.
She also writes terrific books...which i usually try to wait until trade cover to buy---but only make it about half the time....and i buy very few hardcovers except the older used one's that are cheaper than the softcovers at the used shop nearby. And i own all her books...not common for me in the non fiction area.
Todays comment has a lot to so with the fact that our budget will be announced this week. It will be an interesting time...not just because its the first budget where our PM isn't going to be a lame duck (ie need an election real soon in all likelyhood) but also because budgets are traditionally where minority governments fall. And the Liberals just lost their first vote recently (not all votes call for an election...but a budget that doesn't pass does---not from the written constitution but from the unwritten constitution [we have both]).
Now the situations are different between our countries at the moment. We have a federal surplus in the billions. But a lot of that has been gotten by downloading on the provinces who have billions in deficits. Despite all of that there are some silly goals as to how much of the money should go to debt downpayment. In another article McQuaig pointed out how if we just kept up the same payments we would meet 25% of GDP in the early 10's because our GDP is going up....but that we are slowing the economy down quite a bit trying to hasten that time by really quite a short period...i think that article is on my blog earlier...today's article is on a similar theme.
I know the article goes against some of the basic american themes...but then budget surpluses do as well (my dig i suppose...i think we paid too much for the surpluses socially but could have reduced extra borrowing). Try reading the article anyway...you might find it interesting. And its certainly different from most American stuff...and most Canadian stuff too!
When it comes to meeting our Kyoto targets, Paul Martin's resolve has all the firmness of ice cream left too long in the sun. Yet Martin's resolve couldn't be firmer when it comes to meeting his government's debt-reduction target.
One could conclude that debt reduction is simply more important — although nothing could be farther from the truth. Meeting our Kyoto targets has far-reaching consequences for life on Earth, while meeting our debt-reduction target is, well, of virtually no consequence. Some economists think we'd be better off if we didn't meet it.
In the past seven years, Ottawa has taken a staggering $61 billion from federal budget surpluses and put the money towards debt reduction.
We're told this is responsible, that it will reduce interest costs for future generations. But it's about as responsible as parents paying down the mortgage on the family home — even though that means there's no money now to pay for their kids' education, and one or two of them may have to go without food or even live on the street. Martin vows to reduce our debt to 25 per cent of our GDP. Why 25 per cent? Why not 19 per cent, 38 per cent or 41 per cent, where it currently stands? It's an arbitrary number, says Dalhousie University's Lars Osberg, former president of the Canadian Economics Association. A conference of economists meeting in Montreal in 2003 couldn't even decide on what an ideal "debt-to-GDP ratio" might be, Osberg notes.
Yet this intense focus on a largely meaningless debt-reduction target — plus $100 billion in tax cuts announced in 2000 — has left little money for what polls consistently show Canadians want: social re-investment.
We've been encouraged to see social spending as an indulgence we can't afford if we want to be competitive in the global economy.
The Scandinavian countries expose the silliness of this argument. Finland, Sweden and Denmark all have extremely generous social programs, yet they rank among the top five countries in the world in global competitiveness, as measured by the Geneva-based World Economic Forum. Finland's currently number one.
This suggests that, far from being a drain on society's resources, social programs actually increase a country's competitiveness. This isn't surprising. Wouldn't we expect children to do better in school — and later become more productive workers — if they don't go to school hungry and overwhelmed by poverty?
Social programs level the playing field, giving ordinary people opportunities otherwise available only to the rich. So it's not surprising that ordinary people generally favour social spending, while the financial elite tends to prefer tax cuts and debt reduction.
Martin has traditionally sided with members of the elite, from whose ranks he comes. As finance minister in the 1990s, he thrilled them with his deep social spending cuts.
But last spring, finding himself staring atlooming electoral defeat, Martin suddenly grasped the importance of social programs, promising lots of money to rebuild them.
This week's budget will clarify whether Martin's deathbed conversion to social re-investment has held, or whether the ever-active financial elite has managed to reclaim him.
------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------- ----- Linda McQuaig is a Toronto-based author and commentator. lmcquaig@sympatico.ca.
WASHINGTON - A committee advising the U.S. drug regulator ruled Friday that three arthritis drugs linked to heart problems should stay on the American market, a decision that could affect millions of arthritis sufferers.
After 2½ days of hearings, a Food and Drug Administration advisory committee said Celebrex does pose an increased risk to patients taking it, but nonetheless voted 31-1 to let its makers continue selling it because of the anti-inflammatory's effectiveness in relieving severe pain.
Panelists later voted 14-12 to let a similar drug called Bextra stay on the market, with several members abstaining.
A third vote approved the other painkiller in the COX-2 selective inhibitor class, Vioxx.
The committee said Celebrex seems to pose a lower risk of heart problems than the other two drugs, though some members of the panel complained about the dearth of scientific data placed before them.
The Food and Drug Administration does not have to accept the advisory committee's recommendation, though it traditionally does so.
In Canada, Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh said his officials will evaluate the drugs independently of what the FDA decides to do.
"Our scientific experts have been working on this issue for some time," Dosanjh said Friday afternoon, promising, "We will have public input before we make the final decision."
It will be at least six or eight weeks before Health Canada decides what to do about the three anti-inflammatory drugs, he said.
Earlier this week, Dosanjh announced new drug-safety measures, including warnings on potentially risky arthritis medications like Celebrex.
The makers of Vioxx, one of the world's most popular arthritis medications, pulled it from worldwide pharmacy shelves in September 2004 when studies linked it to a higher incidence of heart and stroke problems among patients taking it.
Studies published later suggested the same kind of problems might affect patients taking the other COX-2 selective inhibitors as well.
The American drug manufacturer of Vioxx has said that if the FDA decides the benefits of it and similar pain relievers outweigh the risks, the company might consider putting it back on the market.
"We would have to consider the implications of these new data" for Vioxx, said Peter S. Kim, president of Merck Research Laboratories.
Last year, Canadian doctors wrote more than 13 million prescriptions for the drugs, including Vioxx.
With Vioxx off the market, prescriptions for Celebrex in Canada shot up by 38 per cent last October – amounting to more than 100,000 new prescriptions for the drug.
Vioxx and similar pain killers are "essential to the global war on terrorism"
WASHINGTON - The U.S. drug regulator heard passionate testimony Thursday in defence of Vioxx and similar painkillers – including an army doctor who said the controversial drugs are "essential to the global war on terrorism."
COX-2 inhibitors have been linked to heart problems. (AP file photo)
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration was holding the second of three unprecedented days of public hearings into COX-2 inhibitors such as Celebrex and Vioxx.
Dr. Christopher Grubb told the FDA panel that COX-2 inhibitors need to be kept on the market despite potentially dangerous side effects because troops overseas would suffer without them.
"Consider our military in this particular drug decision," Grubb said, adding that troops use COX-2 drugs because traditional pain relievers such as aspirin have been linked to excess bleeding.
Without them , the United States wouldn't be able to have as many troops on the battlefield, he said.
"Coxhibs are essential in the global war on terrorism."
Patients want to weigh risks themselves
Vioxx was pulled off the market in September 2004 after studies linked the popular arthritis drug to heart and stroke problems. Other studies suggest the problems may apply to the whole class of anti-inflammatory drugs.
An advisory panel of experts must advise the FDA what to do with the Cox-2's that are still on the market – mainly Celebrex and Bextra.
Some witnesses pleaded with the panel on Thursday for the chance to decide for themselves whether they want to take a COX-2.
"I have 40 Vioxx left, I have 40 days before my life and my abilities will be severely altered," said Dimitra Poulos, who suffers from arthritis.
Another woman who relies on COX-2 inhibitors, Judith Fogel, agreed. "I feel like Celebrex was created for me."
Drugs can affect heart like smoking: FDA doctor
The FDA's own epidemiologist told the committee that taking more than the minimum 200 mg dose was as bad for the heart as taking up smoking – and even that lower dose carries risks.
"For the lower dose, it's probably more than hypertension, a little less than diabetes and a little less than smoking," said Dr. David Graham.
Committee members said they face a delicate balancing act in weighing the benefits for many against the risks to a few.
"They want the accessibility and freedom to make their decision, but they also want the government to protect them from things that are undue risk," said Dr. Dennis Boulware, of the FDA committee.
Gerard McNamara, a Canadian who started taking Vioxx in 2001 and has since suffered a stroke and two hearts attacks, was paying close attention to the U.S. hearings.
He said he wished governments had moved earlier to review the drugs.
"I understand it's three or four years they had known it was wrong ... and they should have done something about it."
McNamara is suing the makers of Vioxx, but his doctor has switched him to Bextra for his arthritis pain – a drug that some suggest may be as dangerous.
All drugs carry some risks. The FDA must decide whether the risks of the COX-2s can be mitigated with warning labels and better prescribing, or whether the only ethical decision is to take them off the market for good.
Sorry there has been less here lately. I've been on the slowed down side. I don't know exactly why....but it might be tied into the fact that i have been very anxious lately...enough that it would start a panic attack in most cases if it went from normal to that. We've thrown in a bit of other stuff for that so it may be that...if it is i should adjust i a few days....in the meanwhile the strange story of the day in next post.
Just to note...i take Celebrex (or did). I'm trying to manage with Tylenol now...now granted my arthritis is not as serious as some (mostly in the hands...not a big deal but it does need help especially because it interacts with a learning disability in my hands that cause pain when i write with my hands)...but the pain most arthritis drugs caused for me was worse than average in my stomach( which is why they made Vioxx and similar drugs). Now i didn't go into a total panic but i saw my doctor by mid January and said i wanted to try something else...and this is the first i've heard where they actually are saying how hard it is on your heart...(but it is Vioxx...but they are in the same class).
A lot of it is too many ads for drugs if you ask me...yes some people need them, but also a lot took them instead of other drugs when they weren't really having all that many stomach problems with other (much cheaper) arthritis pills...and in the US i do think this has to do with ads for drugs[and in Canada with us watching your TV and ads for doctors in their magazines (you only see ads for RX drugs in Canada when watching US TV or reading US printed material....they still give ads to the doctors, but i would bet you a smaller percent of Canadian patients took Cox 2's than similar patients in the US....although it was still a large amount, especially when people didn't know they were hazardous.
Look at the list of risks it comapres it to (such as smoking and diabetes) on the heart...seems to me they should be giving hazard pay to any army person that needs to take it...and that it should be off the market. Some argue they should make their own choice....but drug regulations are there partly because we dont' always make the best choices for ourselves...and for the greater good. Off the market no one will take it by accidnet. Myabe there is a middle spot...but that doesn't seem to be what is being discussed.
I mean "essential to the war against terrorism" sounds like propaganda to me! Similar to "ending the cold war" or "winning the cold war". Nobody expected you to take on a risk similar to smoking (knowingly) during that period generally...with the huge exception of Vietnam in the US.M
Well if you've been here a while you know we have bed bugs in my building. I may not have added that i'm allergic to just about every bug that bites (actually if you are allergic to one it common to be allergic to all). My flee bites look like misquito bites...my misquito bites look like...well no one is sure and a bee bite means a week on anti-histamines and i carry an epipen for 2 reasons 1. I get very large swelling in a large area where bitten. I might need it just for the swelling (to allow breathing) if i was bitten on the neck or face and 2. When i was a kid i was bitten twice by wasps and had a general reaction (hives). Generally after that you carry a quit because it can get worse (often does..). I haven't been bitten in days and i must admit i'm often lax in carrying the kit around the city (i react slowly i could probably make it to a hospital....although i'm starting to carry it.....but i insist on always having two because i like camping, hicking and going to friends cottages. I don't get a chance to do it often...but the kits don't last that long (varies by person....but if i have to hike out a mile and then drive....or i'm in a secluded cottage i want a back up. So i guess you can say i'm both lax and serious about it. I remember one of my boyfriends mother said she would never go camping or to a fair if she had that allergy. Now i don't go to fairs all that often...and i don't like all the wasps i see...but if it interests me i go. I do draw the line at backpack camping and canoe in camping where its beyond just moving stuff a short way to get seclusion (ie you can get out fast).
So since we have been provided with so much bad information on the bugs i collected a bunch of information from mostly universities. And i had a CMHA worker to come in for support.
The exterminator guys didn't originally want to take the material i gathered but i think how well it looked helped (it should look better here...except all the carriage breaks will be doubled...a tblog thing, because there is colour here and it isn't broken by page). Also they gave me some little traps i can put around the apt. for an early warning if they come in (or if they are here which i highly doubt...since i'm allergic).
The building was being obtuse as usual. First they talked about how with the apts being so small we could move the stuff into another one to clear the apt. right. Then they admitted they didn't have a free apt. for that at the moment...and well no they wouldn't give you room. If you are trying to spray that makes it very hard here...i would say at least half if not 3/4 of my floor space is used in some way (and a fair amount of that is vertically)....so how am i supposed to get everything 3 feet from the walls. They did a preventative spraying here once but weren't able to do much (at that point there was no talk of spare rooms) because i just couldn't move that much in a very short time. If i need to be sprayed i will get a CMHA worker to try and deal with them on that issue. The main problem is that with 150 square feet in the bachelors they are all full, and mine is more full than most.
So here is everything you wanted to know about bed bugs with some repetition and differences because of the different source. Its all quote...not written by me. As i finished putting it together and was getting the sources listed up i realized how glad i was that it didn't need to be up to university standard....even when just according to sources (copying the way i did would get you kicked out....but i've told everyone its copies and its not university.)
As i said most of it is off university fact sheets...where i took it from is listed at the end...its all from the internet although i lost one address...hence it isn't there.
DISCLAIMER:All of this is informational...if you've got bed bugs i suggest you call and exterminator (those chemicals can make you very sick)...since i was writing it anyway i thought i would share though...oh and the Alaska source was the only one that said that there could even possibly be any way of getting any disease from a bedbug especially in North America. Not likely. You can certainly get west nile easier....or infected bites from scratching but i thought it was worth putting in anyway.
Ineffectiveness of baits for Bed bugs:
The widespread use of baits rather than insecticide sprays for ant and cockroach control is a factor that has been implicated in their return. Bed bugs are blood feeders that do not feed on ant and cockroach baits.
Lifespan and Spread
Bed bugs can live for 4 to 12 months without feeding. The bugs will survive longer without a meal at lower temperatures than at higher temperatures.
l/4 inch in length (aprx 6.5 mm)
One female will produce about 345 eggs during her life span. (in three life spans more than 41,000,000 eggs...my calculation based on three generations a year)
Bed bugs are capable of producing up to four generations per year, although one or two generations is the usual number
The adult's lifespan may encompass 12-18 months. Three or more generations can occur each year.
Development time depends on temperature and food supply, and breeding can occur throughout the year in warmer regions or in colder regions where rooms are kept uniformly heated during winter. Egg laying activity is suspended during winter if rooms are allowed to cool, but adults or nymphs can still overwinter under these conditions. Since some bed bug nymphs may feed more successfully than others, development time may vary greatly even among nymphs from the same generation. For this reason, both adults and nymphs will usually be present throughout the year.
Newly hatched bugs feed at the first opportunity. They molt five times before reaching maturity and require at least one blood meal between each molt. Immature stages can survive approximately two months without feeding; however, most nymphs usually develop into adults within 2 to 6 weeks. Bed bug adults often survive up to 2 months without food, but under certain circumstances can live a year or more without feeding.
The adult female human bed bug lays one to five eggs per day. She may lay a total of 200 eggs when well fed and temperatures are higher than 70° F. The eggs are sticky when freshly laid so they adhere to the object on which they are placed. Eggs hatch in six to 17 days.
Newly hatched bugs feed immediately when food is available. They molt five times (i.e., they shed their outer skin or exoskeleton in order to grow) before reaching maturity, feeding between each molt. There may be three or more generations per year. All ages are found in a reproducing population.
Each female bed bug lays 50 to 200 eggs at the rate of 3 or 4 eggs per day. At temperatures above 70 degrees Fahrenheit, egg hatch occurs in 6 to 17 days. Hatching may take up to 28 days at lower temperatures. Development to the adult stage may occur in as little as one or two months, but usually takes longer.
Bed bugs feed rapidly, becoming engorged in less than ten minutes. The act of biting is usually not felt, but later there is an allergic reaction to the protein found in the bed bug’s saliva. A colorless wheal or lump develops at the bite location; in contrast, flea bites have reddish centers. Discomfort from bed bug bites may last a week or more. Occasional bites indicate a beginning light infestation of adults; many bites result from a heavy, long standing population of nymphs and adults.
They may be accidentally moved with clothes, suitcases, furniture, and other personal items. Human bed bugs may also be transported in second-hand or rental furniture.
The young bugs may live for several weeks without feeding during warm weather and for several months during cool weather. A single bug will live for 10 months when it can obtain food. Under some conditions, it may live a year or longer without food.
When unfed, the common bed bug adult is 1/4 to 3/8 inch in length and brownish in color. After feeding, the body elongates and widens and the color changes to dull red. This apparent change is quite striking and may cause the observer to believe that two different species of insects are present. Bed bug nymphs resemble the adults but are smaller and have a pale yellow coloration after molting. The nymphs undergo five molts, becoming successively larger after each molt.
Difficulities caused by bed bugs
This is accompanied by severe itching that lasts for several hours to days
Rows of three or so welts on exposed skin are characteristic signs of bed bugs. Welts do not have a red spot in the center such as is characteristic of flea bites.
Some individuals respond to bed bug infestations with anxiety, stress, and insomnia. Bed bugs are not known to transmit disease.
Bed bugs have never been proven to carry any diseases of man or animals, but they may have a role in the transmission of hepatitis.
The bite is usually not felt at first but later may itch, swell, burn, become inflamed, or form a welt. Effects of a bite vary with the individual but may persist for a week or more in susceptible persons.
There is no evidence that bed bugs transmit any diseases, at least within the United States.
Bed bugs feed rapidly, becoming engorged in less than ten minutes. The act of biting is usually not felt, but later there is an allergic reaction to the protein found in the bed bug’s saliva. A colorless wheal or lump develops at the bite location; in contrast, flea bites have reddish centers. Discomfort from bed bug bites may last a week or more. Occasional bites indicate a beginning light infestation of adults; many bites result from a heavy, long standing population of nymphs and adult
Inspection for Bedbugs
A thorough inspection of the premises to locate bed bugs and their harborage sites is necessary so that cleaning efforts and insecticide treatments can be focused. Inspection efforts should concentrate on the mattress, box springs, and bed frame, as well as crack and crevices that the bed bugs may hide in during the day or when digesting a blood meal. The latter sites include window and door frames, floor cracks, carpet tack boards, baseboards, electrical boxes, furniture, pictures, wall hangings, drapery pleats, loosened wallpaper, cracks in plaster, and ceiling moldings. Determine whether birds or rodents are nesting on or near the house.
In hotels, apartments, and other multiple-type dwellings, it is advisable to also inspect adjoining units since bed bugs can travel long distances.
Bed bug eggs are elongate, about 1/32 inch long (large enough to be easily seen), white in color, and have a distinct cap at one end. The eggs are laid singly or in clusters and are cemented to wood, fabrics, or other surfaces in places where the bugs hide.
Infestations in hotels, apartments, condominiums, or other multiple dwellings, as well as heavy infestations in private homes, are often best left to a professional pest exterminator. Because of the bed bug's ability to migrate, all units in a multiple dwelling must be inspected, treated where necessary, and periodically checked for reinfestations until all of the bugs are eliminated. Reinfestations in these situations may also occur when new occupants or residents bring in bed bug-infested belongings or furniture. The choices of insecticides for use in hotels, motels, and tourist courts are more limited than those for use in domestic dwellings, but there are still dozens of products available.
The common bed bug hides in cracks, crevices and seams during the day. They prefer narrow crevices, with a rough surface, where their legs and backs touch the opposing surfaces. Wood and paper surfaces are preferred to either stone, metal or plaster, although in the absence of preferred sites or during high population numbers the later will also be utilized. The aforementioned cracks and crevices should be filled with appropriate fillers such as caulking.
Control
In private homes, find all the areas that bed bugs hide in during the day time. These must be treated with chemicals. In hotels, apartments, and other multiple-type dwelling places, bed bugs may spread from one unit to another. All units should be inspected. Remove bird nests.
The common bed bug hides in cracks, crevices and seams during the day. They prefer narrow crevices, with a rough surface, where their legs and backs touch the opposing surfaces. Wood and paper surfaces are preferred to either stone, metal or plaster, although in the absence of preferred sites or during high population numbers the later will also be utilized. The aforementioned cracks and crevices should be filled with appropriate fillers such as caulking.
Bed bug control in the home begins with location of the hiding places used by the insects. A thorough inspection should be made during the day and all hiding places that are located should be treated with a suitable chemical.
If the occupants of a home or apartment infested with bed bugs move out, the bugs may migrate to other nearby dwellings
They may also migrate between homes via wires, plumbing or rain gutters.
In severe infestations the bugs will also be found behind baseboards, window and door casings, picture moldings, loosened wallpaper, cracked plaster, or in furniture.
Seal cracks and crevices where bed bugs may hide. Repair or remove loose wallpaper. Remove pictures, posters, or other objects that may act as hiding places.
Wash infested sheets and bedding in hot water. Infested furniture can be set outside during cold weather to kill all stages of bed bugs. At 0° F, two days is sufficient to kill bed bugs while four to five days is required when the temperature is about 20° F. (aprx -18 C and -7C)
Removal
Discarding the mattress is another option, although a new mattress can quickly become infested if bed bugs are still on the premises.
Repair cracks in plaster and glue down loosened wallpaper to eliminate bed bug harborage sites. Remove and destroy wild animal roosts and nests when possible.
Caulk: and paint the bed and the immediate surroundings so that cracks and crevices are sealed or eliminated. This will prevent bed bug movement and habitation. We also offer caulking as part of our non-chemical pest control services in Alaska.
Insecticides
Residual insecticides (usually pyrethroids) are applied as spot treatments to cracks and crevices where bed bugs are hiding. Increased penetration of the insecticide into cracks and crevices can be achieved if accumulated dirt and debris are first removed using a vacuum cleaner. Avoid using highly repellent formulations, which cause bed bugs to scatter to many places. Dust formulations may be used to treat wall voids and attics. Repeat insecticide applications if bed bugs are present two weeks after the initial treatment since it is difficult to find all hiding places and hidden eggs may have hatched.
Do not use any insecticide on a mattress unless the product label specifically mentions such use. Note that very few insecticides are labeled for use on mattresses. If using an appropriately labeled insecticide on a mattress, take measures to minimize pesticide exposure to occupants. Apply the insecticide as a light mist to the entire mattress, opening seams, tufts, and folds to allow the chemical to penetrate into these hiding areas. Allow the treated surface to completely dry before use. Do not sleep directly on a treated mattress; be sure bed linens are in place. Do not treat mattresses of infants or ill people. Alternatives to using an insecticide on a mattress are discussed in the 'Sanitation' and 'Trapping' sections.
Choose one of the following insecticides: chlorpyrifos, permethrin, propoxur (e.g. Baygon) [may be listed as o isopropoxyphenyl methylcarbamate], cyfluthrin, fenvalerate [may be listed as cyano (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl 4-chloro alpha-(1-methyl-ethyl) benzeneacetate, tetramethrin, resmethrin [may be listed as (5-benzyl-3-furyl) methyl 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-methylp ropenyl) cyclopropanecarboxylate], or d-trans allethrin. These insecticides are purchased in ready-to-use aerosol or liquid forms from hardware stores, retail variety stores and similar places.
No insecticides are labeled for use on bedding or linens. These items should be dry cleaned or laundered.
The majority of insecticides currently labeled for bed bug control in indoor domestic dwelling situations contain either pyrethrins or synthetic pyrethroids. These include formulations containing allethrin, deltamethrin, D-phenothrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin, pyrethrins, resmethrin, and tetramethrin. Among products for homeowners this is especially the case, although a few other types of insecticides are available. Non-pyrethrin-derivative ingredients include benzylcarbinyl propionate plus eugenol, carbaryl (Sevin), chlorpyrifos (Dursban), diatomaceous earth, silica gel, and S-methoprene, some of which are available only in formulations intended for commerical applicators.
Fumigants (intended only for use by commercial applicators in vacated structures) include methyl bromide, and sulfuryl fluoride (Vikane). All of these fumigants are Restricted-Use-Pesticides and are inherently dangerous. Special training and equipment is required to legally purchase and use these fumigants.
Ideally, an insecticide spray should be applied to to the slats, springs, and frame of the bed. Do not treat mattresses or bedding directly unless the product you use is specifically labeled for this purpose! Such items should be sprayed lightly, but not to the point of wetness. Allow mattresses or other bedding to dry thoroughly before using.
Brush or spray applications of insecticides should be made to baseboards, wall cracks, and other hiding areas that may harbor bed bugs. Because they degrade rapidly, applications of insecticides containing pyrethrins should be repeated several times at weekly intervals. Other pyrethroids have varying degrees of residual action and can probably be applied less often (consult the label of the specific product).
Pesticides can be applied to cracks and crevices of dressers, wooden bed frames and headboards, door and window trim, baseboards and similar sites. Three classes of insecticides are reviewed: (1) Botanical insecticides containing natural pyrethrins will repel insects and can 'knock down' bed bugs for a period of time, but natural pyrethrins quickly deteriorate and do not provide the necessary residual action of some other materials. Finishes on furniture and other wood items may be damaged from the petroleum carriers contained in aerosol pyrethrins. (2) Inorganic materials such as silica gel, boric acid and diatomaceous earth will provide long-term control provided they are used in an environment with low humidity. These inorganic materials have very low repellency, have a long residual life, and can provide good control if thoroughly applied to cracks and crevices. However, they are typically white in color and may leave the surface of items with an undesirable film unless they are carefully applied. (3) Synthetic pyrethroids such as deltamethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin and others can provide good control if they are carefully and thoroughly applied to suspected bed bug harborages. They are relatively long-lived residuals and will not damage materials that are not harmed by water. Consideration should be given to the fact that people typically spend in excess of 8 hours per day in the bedroom. If the insecticides are properly applied, there should be little risk of exposure.
Sources used:
Eric Day,(contact) Bed Bugs Manager, Insect Identification Laboratory2003,RevisedSep tember2003; August 1996
Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences -Cooperative Extentension---Cooperativ e Extension,Entomological NotesDepartment of Entomology ;April 2003,RevisedSeptember2003
Well there are certainly a lot of stories in Canada about unionizing Wal-Marts...and i only went looking in CBC.CA. The CBC.CA articles are always short piecies with the details...but they are usually good, well written and there is no time expiry on looking them up. I thought they would work well for a piece on Wal-Mart and what it is up to in Canada when stores are trying to unionize. Also a lot of the hijinks that Wal Mart plays during unionization are left out (since they aren't long pieces) although you can see one at the end where a CBC person filming the voting (but obviously not able to see the votes) was a reason why Wal Mart wanted a vote cancelled.
Also Wal Mart just seems to object to Canadian law regarding unions (but not to having stores in Canada or selling stuff here it seems). If they weren't allowed to hand out stuff that is because they weren't allowed. I know that if they were complaining about how one was certified without a vote its because they likely were viewed as having put pressure on people to vote one way or else (job or not). In Canada, in some provinces that means that you are automatically certified. Because if you can't work towards unionizing without getting fired...well that makes it hard to vote on the issue doesn't it? I know that a Ontario store was unionized over the same issue. Labour law is provincial and differs from spot to spot (and over time depending on the government).
But i think this quote was the best "I guess the only thing that is not viable for Wal-Mart is to live with a union," Bolduc says.
My guesss as to why they want the certification changed in the other Quebec store...it looks awfully bad if you close two unionized stores because they are suddenly loosing money. Of course i'm also known for being skeptical...at the end is a list of other stories on Wal-Mart in Canada and unions that CBC had.
This is not an exhaustive reporting of what came up when i put Wal-Mart and union* into CBC.CA's engine...i think its sufficient though. It does leave out the fact that one Ontario Wal-Mart was unionized for 3 years but decertified (i would bet after the law was changed after the election of a certain party in the recent past). They encouraged decertification quite stronglyM
Last Updated Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:21:17 EST CBC News SAINT-HYACINTHE, QUE. - Wal-Mart Canada says it will appeal a provincial decision to unionize its store in Saint-Hyacinthe, Que., CBC News has learned.
Sunday's announcement follows the retailer's decision to shelve its unionized store in Jonquière, Que., this May. Wal-Mart said the store was losing money and the union refused to make the necessary concessions to keep it open.
Six months ago the Jonquière store became the only Wal-Mart store in North America to be unionized.
...The United Food and Commercial Workers Union accuses Wal-Mart of not respecting Quebec's labour laws, but the retailer claims the union hasn't played by the rules.
"Any time you have a workplace that ends up being unionized, without the employees in that workplace voting for a union, in our view we have a questionable situation," said Andrew Pelletier, Wal-Mart Canada's public affairs director.
....The retailer also faces legal troubles south of the border. It has agreed to pay a fine of $135,000 US for breaking child labour laws.
Wal-Mart denies the allegations, but decided to pay the fine just the same.
Web Posted | Jan 20 2005 08:55 AM EST
CBC News
Second Quebec Wal-Mart gets union certification ST-HYACINTHE, QUE. - A union certification drive at a second Quebec Wal-Mart store has succeeded, according to the United Food And Commercial Workers (UFCW) union.
'Wal-Mart workers now realize that if they want a union in their store, Wal-Mart can't stop them'
The union said Wednesday that workers at a Wal-Mart in St-Hyacinthe, Que. have been certified as a bargaining unit after a majority of its 200 workers signed UFCW membership cards
"We'll be sending a letter to Wal-Mart tomorrow to set dates to begin bargaining," said UFCW Canada local president Yvon Bellemare in a release.
"We expect to deliver our contract proposal to Wal-Mart some time in the next two to three weeks," he said....
The St-Hyacinthe location and the Wal-Mart in Jonquière, Que. are now the only unionized Wal-Marts—not just in Quebec but in all of North America.
...Wal-Mart, which the UFCW calls "staunchly anti-union", is also facing certification applications at about a dozen other locations in Quebec, Saskatchewan and British Columbia, including applications representing workers at seven Wal-Mart Tire & Lube Express departments in B.C.
"The momentum is picking up," said UFCW Canada's national director, Michael Fraser.
"Wal-Mart workers now realize that if they want a union in their store, Wal-Mart can't stop them."
Wal-Mart has 235 stores in Canada, employing more than 60,000 people.
Web Posted | Oct 14 2004 10:22 AM EDT
CBC News
Union accuses Wal-Mart of fearmongering
...Approximately 150 staff members at the Wal-Mart store in the Saguenay were certified as a bargaining unit on Aug. 2, 2004.
...Union skeptical
Workers were surprised to hear Wal-Mart say the store isn't economically viable, according to Louis Bolduc, who speaks for the UFCW.
"I guess the only thing that is not viable for Wal-Mart is to live with a union," Bolduc says.[emphasis mine]
...The 180 workers at a third store, in Brossard, Que., filed for certification on July 22, 2004.
...The United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) claims it has the support of more than 50 per cent of the 130 eligible workers at the store in Thompson.
But Wal-Mart says it contests the conduct of the voting process, including coverage by the media. Wal-Mart claims a CBC cameraman was too close to voters while taping footage from the store's parking lot, and could have influenced the voters' decisions.
In a statement, the company says: "Wal-Mart is concerned that the integrity of the voting process in Thompson is protected. Under Manitoba law, there is no electioneering permitted at a workplace or polling station on the day of a vote."
...However, the UFCW says CBC's presence was not influencing anyone and called the entire process fair.
Colin Trigwell, organizing director with the union, denounced the move. "It's terrible. To me, it's another stall tactic in delaying the democratic process," he said.
The Manitoba Labour Relations Board did not return phone calls to the CBC, but a board representative said Thursday there is no law restricting the media from covering any labour vote in the province.
The union vows this delay will not slow down its drive to unionize all Wal-Marts in the province.
...Workers at the Thompson store voted June 4. Results of the vote were released Friday by the Manitoba Labour Board.
It's the second time the Manitoba employees have voted on the issue. Last August, they voted 61 to 54 against representation by the United Food and Commercial Workers union (UFCW).
Wal-Mart and the UFCW have engaged in a heated battle over the years. Union officials have accused the company of convincing employees to vote against the union.
The company issued a statement after the Manitoba board released the results: "Wal-Mart was extremely limited in its communication to its own associations about the issue of unionization throughout the union's lengthy and aggressive organizing."
After a handful of meatpackers in Texas joined the UFCW, they were laid off when the company switched to pre-packaged meat. [emphasis mine] Wal-Mart is also fighting a union certification order in Saskatchewan. It wants the right to give employees information during a union drive.
VANCOUVER – B.C.'s Labour Relations Board has ruled Wal-Mart violated the rights of workers at its Quesnel store by interfering with efforts to unionize the store.
United Food and Commercial Workers union spokesperson Tom Fawkes says he's pleased the LRB has upheld the workers' right to decide – without intimidation or coercion – whether they want to join the union.
"It pointed out that Wal-Mart did violate the code, and it did interfere in its employees' right to exercise freedom to choose whether they want to, or don't want to, belong to a union."
The LRB has ordered managers at the Wal-Mart store to read its decision aloud to all its employees.
My counsellor has been curious to get to know more of the outside of me type of thing. At one point i talked of bringing in some pictures then i decided i wasn't comfortable with it at the time.
Last week i was talking about pictures and my family (which is very wierd--my mom wouldn't give me pictures of my childhood until i was 27!). I was also discussing some particular pictures so i decided to bring in the my more formal album and one framed shot.
Well it was a hard session. And at the first glance i think my counsellor got more out of it than it did. But then first glances are not always the most accurate.
I had described to her how loved i had been as a little child. But she didn't really get it until she saw the pictures. She kinda kept on saying (when i pointed it out during the session) that she figured i'd been loved but that she hadn't been able to comprehend how i could be describing how things were and have parents i've not talked to in four years...and only a few calls (like less than 10) since 1997...i litteraly mean no contact.
And she said that it was obvious what a loss i had suffered and that we would have to deal with that. I don't think she is the first one that might have made this mistake (looking back in hindsight). I guess most kids might like to think their early childhoods were good if they were later abused. In my case i wasn't able to remember a lot of it until i was 17 (recovered memories...they were hard to remember at first because of the above). It was too horrible for me to remember what my life as a 3 year old and 4 year old (and 2 year old for that matter...i've always known from fragments that my memory goes far back---me and my mom were able to time me remembering some stuff back to the summer i turned two [august birthday] by me describing a camping trip we could have taken only that summer.
But those memories took quite a while to go away. I'm pretty sure i had them into my tween and likely my early teens. And it was such a contradiction with what i was living at that point that it was just better that they become less vivid is suppose. The mind does work to try and protect you. Having reliably remembered so much stuff i have faith that what i do get back (usually in snippets) is reliable (in many cases there was a third party i could ask about a good part of stuff)...
So my counsellor ended up thanking me quite a bit for brining them in. And she understood why i didnt' intially and had some interesting ideas as to why i wasn't given them until twenty seven (such as they would look like they might not be telling the truth if i had the pictures because they are so powerful...not all of them but a bunch). People just figured that it wasn't quite that close i would guess...not all families are. Not all mothers have spending time with their kid on the top of the list for the day (cooking dinner was the only main thing during the day, and sometimes getting groceries that i remember being all that much more of a deal---although of course you don't see it that way as a 2 or 3 year old.)
For instance my parents wanted me to want to read (as opposed to being forced). So my mom read fairy tales to me every day in the living room on the couch (the only time i was allowed there as a small kid to make it more special) and most nights my father read to me before i went to bed. And me and my mom would go to the library and spend a lot of time choosing the books (i think she picked up others too, but i'm not sure...and i know at one point the adult cards were taking out kid books because we had reached the max---but i think that was when my brother was around (he was born when i was almost three---still i think it was 12 books a card...so to need space for more than 24 books showed how much we read). My mom later said that no one read the fairy tales to her when she was a child so she got to experience them for the first time when she was reading them to me.
The biggest thing that i got out of this was a question. My dad is in very few of the photos because (generally) he was taking them. Now the photos do change over time...and my counsellor could see when they became more for show, less love in them (my book jumps around a bit because i started it before my mom gave me the pictures so it has some from later that i took). But i was looking at some of the one's taken when i was younger...the couple with my dad show him also caring a lot about me...but there are only a few of those.
What i ended up wondering was could you take the quantity and quality of pictures he did (he was an amateur photographist and developed his black and white) and have them turn out as well as they did if you didn't love the subject a lot (ie me).
The shots with him show that he is not as comfortable in public (ie no family---but then i only have a couple of those...who knows them generally). But the one's taken by extended family show him looking very loving towards me.
But as i said what caught my attention more this time was how the pictures were taken. I think they do show more love than i might have thought. Because relations with him broke down a lot earlier and my mom was a stay at home mom i don't remember him as well (remembering that thigns started falling apart at 5). I do have some good memories, but not a lot. But i remembered he loved taking pictures of us kids. I'm going to have to meditate on how you consider the person that is using the camera and what it shows about their feelings about you.M
BC government is fixing a gov. wesite has homosexuality as a disorder
I think this one talks for itself...the database or something similar sounds like it went up in the 80's. Homosexuality was taken of the list of psychiatric disorders in the DSM in the early 73. And to list it next to bestiality and pedeophillia...its upsetting to still come across this junk...although at least the government is reacting quickly. The full article is linked with the title. At least the BC government is willing to deal with it quickly and not argue about it....they might want to review their codes to see if there are other problems i would think.M
VANCOUVER - The B.C. Ministry of Health is correcting a government website that describes homosexuality as a mental disorder, next to bestiality and pedophilia.
Until Thursday, the description was there on the Medical Services Plan website in a section that provides diagnostic codes for doctors to use when filing for reimbursement from the provincial government. The site is accessible to the general public as well as doctors.
He wants an explanation as to how the listing made it to the website in the first place...
..."It saddens me to think that the government has allowed this kind of statement or rationale or process to still continue," he said. "Obviously something needs to be done from either an administrative level or a political level."
Maynard said there was a time when psychiatrists universally believed that homosexuality was a mental disorder. But the American Psychiatric Association struck that characterization from its diagnostic manuals in 1973....
Health Ministry spokesperson Michelle Stewart said the diagnostic codes have been listed for doctors since the 1980s.
Stewart said the province was just made aware of the problem on Wednesday, and she promised to have it taken off the website immediately.
Hi...these are a couple more stories on the closing of the Jonquier Wal Mart...six months after it unizioned. Its too bad for the people working there that there is a Liberal government provincially at the moment..a Partie Quebecois (PQ) government would be more likely to act (in Quebec the Liberal party is federalist but fairly conservative [but not near to Republican] wherease the PQ has both Conservative and Liberals...mind you their final goal is to make Quebec a seperate country...which is controversial as is some of their French language promotion laws (generally they don't get on my nerves as much as some Canadians...partly because they have a left wing...the only party in Quebec that gets seats provincially that has them..). I folowed the Ontario case mentioned...it was very messy from what i remember...i'm not sure and i might be remembering wrong (or it might have been gossip) but i think they threatened to close...? I don't know if they ever succesffuly negotated a contract. And if you notice that group was unioned because of intimidation (which was the part i followed). From what i remember that involved firing people who were trying to unionize but where it looked like they hadn't broken the law (ie were working within labour law in how they were trying to unionize...but its been a while since i read up on it...likely aout 3 years)...M
The retail giant and the union in Jonqière were in the middle of negotiating a contract when Wal-Mart decided to shut the store down, saying it was not making money.
The union says the store is making money, and that Wal-Mart is closing it simply to send a message to workers across the country that unions aren't welcome.
The union is filing several complaints with the Labour Relations Board.
It's also asking the provincial government to intervene.
But Premier Jean Charest says his government won't intervene unless Wal-Mart breaks the law.
"We expect businesses and citizens who operate in Quebec, no matter what sector they're in, or what they're involved in, to respect our laws and we expect that from Wal-Mart," Charest says.
So far the union is not calling for a consumer boycott of Wal-Mart.
It says it does not want to punish workers at other stores across the country who are trying to unionize.
Paul Cavalluzzo is a labour lawyer who represents the United Food and Commercial Workers. He says a labour board challenge, if successful, could force Wal-Mart to reopen the store, or force it to pay significant fines.
In 1997, workers at a Wal-Mart store in Windsor, Ont., won union certification after an Ontario labour board ruled that the company had intimidated workers. Three years later, employees voted to de-certify the union.
Labour rules out Wal-Mart boycott Last Updated Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:11:53
TORONTO - Organized labour in Quebec has announced a series of moves to fight Wal-Mart's closure of its first unionized store in the province, but those moves, for now at least, stop short of a boycott.
The Quebec Federation of Labour (FTQ) said a boycott could backfire, pointing out that several unionization drives are underway at other Wal-Marts in Canada. FTQ president Henri Masse said Wal-Mart might accuse his group of working against its own people.
Instead, the labour movement will focus its Wal-Mart strategy on the Quebec government and will fight the closure through labour tribunals.
The union representing the 200 Wal-Mart employees to lose their jobs at the Jonquière store said it would file unfair labour practice charges against the retailer.
UFCW Canada national director Michael Fraser said Wal-Mart's decision to shut the store in Jonquière was meant as a warning to other Wal-Mart employees thinking of unionizing.
"Wal-Mart, which now controls the working lives of 70,000 Canadians, made a business decision that the cost of disposing 200 men and women in Jonquière was a good long term investment in creating fear in the rest of their employees across Canada and the United States," Fraser said.
Fraser said the UFCW would file a charge that the chain engaged in bad-faith bargaining.
Fraser also said it will ask the Quebec Labour Relations Commission to force Wal-Mart to prove that the store in Jonquière was losing money, as the chain has claimed.
"We know that in spite of the company's statements, Wal-Mart's decision to wreck the lives of 200 workers, their families and their community was not about profits," Fraser said.
"The store was making money and would have continued to make money like other unionized retail chains in Quebec," he said.
Quebec Premier Jean Charest says his government won't intervene unless Wal-Mart breaks the law.
"We expect businesses and citizens who operate in Quebec no matter what sector they're in or what they're involved in to respect our laws and we expect that from Wal-Mart," he said.
Workers at another Wal-Mart store, in Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, won union certification in January but do not have a collective agreement.
News article on how Canada apparently stunned Bush when we didn't follow you into Iraq
I thought this was an interesting article when i came across it in the Toronto Star...the article actually deals with a lot of other issues like the appointment of the new ambassador to the US and the ballistic missle issue...but the most interesting part is about how the US apparently thought we would follow them into war in Iraq.
We were scared up here the government might make the mistake, but less so when they made it clear it just wasn't happening without a UN resolution (and we kept on protesting to keep the pressure on). How the US government could just assume we would come along for the trip is beyond me...seems like another stupid assumption by the Bush team...
here is the part of the article i thought would be interesting. To get a look at it in full go to How Canada stunned Bush in the Toronto Star (the full article will be available with no cost for a week from this Wednesday...i'm pretty sure they charge after that). M
I would like to thank mquinn02tblog.com (You will anyway) for giving me the html for the box...although i take responsibility for fidling with it considerably!
How Canada stunned Bush
Iraq stand hard to believe for U.S.
Retiring envoy makes revelation
TIM HARPER WASHINGTON BUREAU
WASHINGTON—Canada's outgoing ambassador to Washington revealed for the first time yesterday the shock and disbelief in the Bush administration when prime minister Jean Chrétien kept Canadian troops out of Iraq.
Michael Kergin said in an interview yesterday that administration insiders had all but ignored the diplomatic signals from Ottawa in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq.
Despite all the signs and statements from Ottawa about the need for United Nations backing, the decision somehow still caught official Washington off guard, he said.
"Sometimes in these things, the wish gives father to the thought," said Kergin, who retires at the end of this month.
Canada had flagged its intentions, Kergin said, but in the National Security Council, then the domain of national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, and in Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon — "in spite of themselves, they still thought ... somehow we would find a way.
"It's like you can't quite believe it when you're told it and you really believe in the end it would happen. And in this case, it didn't."
Kergin said before a final message could be conveyed, Chrétien's statement to the House of Commons was broadcast live on CNN.
The U.S. State Department and National Security Councils both used the term "disappointment," as did U.S. Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci, Kergin said, but the tone of the reaction he received indicated anger and irritation, even if those words were never used.
"What I kept hearing from up on (Capitol) Hill, was `You were with us in World War II, you were always with us, how could you let us down now?'" Kergin recalled.
"I'd hear `You were with us in Korea, how could you not be with us,' ignoring entirely the sort of unilateral approach to Iraq. That just doesn't figure in their thinking, particularly."
Republicans upbraided him for ignoring the threat to the North America continent because Saddam Hussein was believed to have weapons of mass destruction — a claim now refuted.
Wal-Mart to close unionized Quebec Store---is this where you want to shop?
I wouldn't take any of this we can't make money stuff...unless its "we can't make as much because you are setting a precedent and we will contine with the one of shutting down any part of Wal Mart that manages to unionize".Wal Mart has a history of closing any part of the company that manages to get unionized (some meat packers in the US did---and suddenly Wal Mart no longer had a need of their services...they dropped the product).
These guys don't play fair, routinely discriminate against women employees (there are currently a lot of lawsuits going on about this...one i think is class action, and their firing of employees working on unionization in Ontario has gone to court, i've been following the case) and fire anyone that looks like they might be trying to unionize the shop. I wouldn't be surprised if they try to close the 2nd unionized shop in Quebec...which will loose them a lot of Quebec buisness. It ought to loose them business across North America! I boycott them...only bought stuff there once or twice. I did this from the start because of low pay, how they often shut down small towns and how they treated their staff.If you are in Canada think of Zellers (they have issues too, but not as serious) or in the states Kmart or possibly J. C. Penney (i'm open to comments on better shops.....i don't thik they could be any worse than Walmart and i know Zellers is better on labour policy for Canada with similar prices).
I know they are involved in a dispute over labour law in Ontario over their actions as well (i follow the case now and then...the rulings and discussion turn up now and again when i'm reading stuff...one day i should make a habbit of following closer...i'm already convinced they are cheating on our labour law...its just a matter of seeing how it plays out).
Wal Mart is selling things cheaper on the backs of communities they are in and the people working there. I urge you to consider shopping somewher else! And they go after stupid law suits. When they came to Canada they tried to get a small group of shops call Wool Mart (that had definitely been in Canada first) to change their name by suing them when they wouldn't change it ...because it was infringement on their name. Thing is it was only a few shops (if memory serves less than 5) and they stood up to them...they had been around since before anyone in Canada had heard of Wal Mart and possibly earlier than Wal Mart. And like a 5 store chain that,sells wool and knitting suppplies is likely to be misunderstood as being a Wal Mart?
MISSISSAUGA, ONT. - Wal-Mart Canada is closing its store in Jonquiere, Que., the company announced Wednesday – six months after the store became the first Wal-Mart to be unionized in North America.
Wal-Mart said it was unable to reach a tentative agreement with the union that would "permit it to operate the store in an efficient and profitable matter."
(CP File Photo>
In a news release, Wal-Mart said it had told the United Food and Commercial Workers union during negotiations for a first contract that the store's financial situation was "precarious."
The company said the union's demands would have required more hiring and added hours.
But the union disputed Wal-Mart's contention that the closing was for financial reasons. UFCW Canada spokesman Michael Forman told CBC Business News the closing was "a gross infraction of labour practice" and "an assault on all Canadians" and said the union would continue the fight.
But he acknowledged that it would make other Wal-Mart employees think twice before voting for union accreditation.
Canadian Press quoted one employee at the store, which is 250 kilometres north of Quebec City, as saying many workers burst into tears when managers told them about the closing.
The store, which has about 190 employees, will close in May.
Last week, the union asked the Quebec minister of labour for binding arbitration to reach a contract in Jonquiere. The union said no progress had been made.
Another Quebec Wal-Mart, in Saint-Hyacinthe, won union certification in January.
Wal-Mart, which the UFCW calls "staunchly anti-union," is facing certification applications at about a dozen other locations in Quebec, Saskatchewan and British Columbia – including applications representing workers at seven Wal-Mart Tire & Lube Express departments in B.C.
Wal-Mart has 235 stores in Canada, employing more than 60,000 people.
Reading Doe. v. Bolton...for a good cause at least
Well as expected the part in the Wikipedia was put back to how the other person wants it...along with a comment saying i'd only talked about Roe v. Wade and that if i'd read Doe v. Bolton it would be obvious as to why i was wrong to talk about trimesters being a factor in the legality of laws on abortions in the US.
Also a mention of a Senate committe from 1983 that decided there weren't many laws that were about abortion...and i don't think she meant just abortion but surrounding laws...although i'll take that as possible.
So i read through the decision on Doe. V. Bolton (the majority decisions) posted up the references to Wade as well as the references to how while the court was saying the Georgia laws were unconsitutional that laws could be made, and the laws that could be made were around trimesters.
And i wrote a comment back (along with a link to the case if she wants to read it...she wanted me to read pro life interpretations of the case...i prefer to go and read the case. I said i was willing to agree that there weren't many laws about doctors being punished for performing abortions after Roe and Doe because of how strong the decions were and how they decided to make it hard to get an abortion instead (ie no medicaid and wierd state laws...one city managed to pass a law that an abortion clinic couldn't use the water or sewage which was apparently legal as you could still have an abortion...where is a different problem apparently).
And i said a 1983 report didn't hold much water on limits given that Reagan and